Archive for Thursday, January 3, 2008
Research differs on value of drug testing
January 3, 2008
De Soto USD 232 Board of Education President Janine Gracy said when looking at student drug testing research, it is important to be informed.
"Most of the journals that I have read that say it doesn't work usually preface it by saying as the only prevention strategy that, no, it doesn't work," she said. "You have to have a comprehensive strategic plan that would include education, that would include treatment and referral."
A federally-funded study cited in The New York Times said there was no sign that drug testing deters students' drug use. The study was published in May 2003 in The Journal of School Health. The study found that 37 percent of 12th-graders in schools that performed drug-testing said they had smoked marijuana in the last year compared to 36 percent in schools that did not.
Dr. Lloyd D. Johnston, a study researcher from the University of Michigan, wrote that findings from the study support that students' attitudes toward drugs did not change because schools implemented drug-testing. Johnston also is one of the principal investigators for Monitoring the Future, which is an ongoing study assessing behaviors and attitudes, including drug use, of American secondary school students, college students and young adults. Monitoring the Future has been funded by a series of research grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse and its results are routinely used in the White House Strategy on Drug Abuse.
Methods questioned
However, Johnston's research findings sparked disagreements from another drug-testing expert.
Dr. Robert L. DuPont, president of the Institute for Behavior and Health and first director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, published a commentary in response to the research in which he criticized the surveyors' method in gathering and comparing data. DuPont also said to his knowledge it had never been implied that student drug testing would be an ideal drug prevention program for any school.
"The policy question facing schools today is whether adding well-structured, non-punitive student drug testing deters illegal drug use and helps parents and students find and use effective help earlier in the cycle of drug dependence," he said in his commentary.
Corinne Shea, project assistant for the Institute for Behavior and Health, which DuPont created, said there are very few research studies on student drug testing programs and many of them claim that drug testing does not reduce drug use in schools.
However, she cautioned that it is difficult to prove causality in any research study because of outside factors.
"I think one of the most important things to stress when it comes to student drug testing is that the results are very much dependent on the process," Shea said. "It is the process that needs to be researched: How often will a school randomly test for drugs? How many students are in the testing pool? What percentage of the student body will actually be tested each year? All of these things have a significant impact on the usefulness and results of a student drug testing program."
Testing worked in Illinois, principal says
Joe Sabatino, superintendent of Community High School District 117 in Lake Villa, Ill., said reported drug use declined after the district implemented student drug testing.
"Before we started drug testing we were giving students surveys," he said. "Four years later students were coding significantly less use of drugs."
Gracy, a member of the committee studying random student drug testing, said her professional opinion was that drug testing can reduce instances of drug use.
Gracy is the director of the Regional Prevention Center of Johnson, Leavenworth and Miami counties.
"The NCAA has been testing their athletes for several years now and they have found that it really does deter drug use," she said.
Gracy said the district does have a drug-use policy in place, however the drug-testing committee could propose some changes to that policy.
"We need to sit down and look and see exactly what we have in place, what we feel is working and what is not, and then combine that with drug testing," she said.
Advertisement
Top ads RSS
- LMSW, LSCSW, LPC Program Therapist Mental Health Program FW Huston ...
- Senior Engineer The future of media is here!! KTKA 49 ...
- Foundation Assistant CREW Network, a Lawrence based national association, is ...
- Holiday Inn Express Hotel & Suites Looking for friendly, customer ...
- Payroll & Billing Specialist Assist with operation of payroll management ...


4 January 2008
at 8:35 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
pcholakis (Anonymous) says…
Indeed, misinformation is rampant concerning the topic of random student drug testing.
As Board of Education President Janine Gracy points out, research on the topic should be reviewed carefully and decisions made in the best interests of children.
Here are the facts, which unfortunately Ms. Gracy may have miscommunicated.
1. Random drug testing, in concert with educational and student assistance programs ARE very effective. The intergration of these three components is required to help assure heathly, safe schools in today's environment.
2. A careful review of “Reseach” that contradicts #1 above, reveals that it did not compare schools that provided comprehensive random school drug testing to those that did not. All studies, though limited in number, that do in fact make this comparision demonstrate a direct positive correlation relative to random student drug testing.
Far more research however is available in the private and public workplace sectors, as well as the DOD, where random drug testing has been shown to decrese substance abuse dramatically, as well as lower accidents by over 50%, and lower incidence rates of workplace theft, violence, etc.
3. Marijuana is NOT, nor should it be the primary concern of parents and schools. Other than drugged driving, marijuana doesn't kill, nor does it typically produce other socially negative behaviors above and beyond those similar to alcohol use.
The abuse of prescription medications, such as Oxycontin, Lortab, Vicodin, etc, is on the other hand addictive, fatal and critical problem facing our society. The abuse of prescription medications exceeds that of marijuana use in most schools, and is forecast to become a worldwide problem by international research organizations.
In summary, let's speak openly and honestly…. Random student drug testing is a political issue. This is the REAL problem.
While surverys show that most students and parents are in favor of implementation, school administrators elect to delay based upon a vocal minority lobbyinng against a pro-active solution.
Drug testing is NOT a violation of the 4th Admendment, nor an invasion of privacy, as the Supreme Court and other court systems have repeatly stated. It is however, an important part of any solution to address substance abuse.
School adminstrations are political beasts that shy away from any form of change, unless pressure is applied. The policy question facing schools today is whether or to implement comprehensive non-punitive student drug testing, in conjunction with education and counselling to deters illegal drug use… or not.
It's that simple.